Rating - 9/10
Date finished- March 14, 2021
3ïžâŁThe book in 3 sentences
If youâre an introvert, find your flow by using your gifts. You have the power of persistence, the tenacity to solve complex problems, and the clear-sightedness to avoid pitfalls that trip others up.
Work alone. Youâre going to be best able to design revolutionary products and features if youâre working on your own. Not on a committee. Not on a team.
 Introverts are not necessarily shy. Shyness is the fear of social disapproval or humiliation, while introversion is a preference for environments that are not overstimulating.
đĄThoughts
What a book! The book's first section is excellent, and while it does wane towards the end, it retains its charm. It's a well-researched book that I'd recommend to anyone, especially introverts.
âïžSummary + High yield notes
âWe live with a value system that I call the Extrovert Idealâthe omnipresent belief that the ideal self is gregarious, alpha, and comfortable in the spotlight.â
âWe like to think that we value individuality, but all too often we admire one type of individualâthe kind whoâs comfortable âputting himself out there.â Sure, we allow technologically gifted loners who launch companies in garages to have any personality they please, but they are the exceptions, not the rule, and our tolerance extends mainly to those who get fabulously wealthy or hold the promise of doing so.â
âIntroverts living under the Extrovert Ideal are like women in a manâs world, discounted because of a trait that goes to the core of who they are. Still, todayâs psychologists tend to agree on several important points: for example, that introverts and extroverts differ in the level of outside stimulation that they need to function well. Introverts feel âjust rightâ with less stimulation, as when they sip wine with a close friend, solve a crossword puzzle, or read a book. Extroverts enjoy the extra bang that comes from activities like meeting new people, skiing slippery slopes, and cranking up the stereo.â
âOther people are very arousing,â says the personality psychologist David Winter, explaining why your typical introvert would rather spend her vacation reading on the beach than partying on a cruise ship. âThey arouse threat, fear, flight, and love. A hundred people are very stimulating compared to a hundred books or a hundred grains of sand.â
Extroverts tend to tackle assignments quickly. They make fast (sometimes rash) decisions, and are comfortable multitasking and risk-taking.
They enjoy âthe thrill of the chaseâ for rewards like money and status.
Introverts often work more slowly and deliberately. They like to focus on one task at a time and can have mighty powers of concentration. Theyâre relatively immune to the lures of wealth and fame.
âExtroverts are the people who will add life to your dinner party and laugh generously at your jokes. They tend to be assertive, dominant, and in great need of company. Extroverts think out loud and on their feet; they prefer talking to listening, rarely find themselves at a loss for words, and occasionally blurt out things they never meant to say. Theyâre comfortable with conflict, but not with solitude.â
Introverts, in contrast, may have strong social skills and enjoy parties and business meetings, but after a while wish they were home in their pajamas. They prefer to devote their social energies to close friends, colleagues, and family. They listen more than they talk, think before they speak, and often feel as if they express themselves better in writing than in conversation. They tend to dislike conflict. Many have a horror of small talk, but enjoy deep discussions.
Nor are introverts necessarily shy. Shyness is the fear of social disapproval or humiliation, while introversion is a preference for environments that are not overstimulating.
As Jung felicitously put it, âThere is no such thing as a pure extrovert or a pure introvert. Such a man would be in the lunatic asylum.â
đ«đźFinland is a famously introverted nation. Finnish joke: How can you tell if a Finn likes you? Heâs staring at your shoes instead of his own.
đšâđ§The rise of the âmighty likeable fellowâ
âAmerica had shifted from what the influential cultural historian Warren Susman called a Culture of Character to a Culture of Personalityâand opened up a Pandoraâs Box of personal anxieties from which we we would never quite recover.â
âIn the Culture of Character, the ideal self was serious, disciplined, and honorable. What counted was not so much the impression one made in public as how one behaved in private. The word personality didnât exist in English until the eighteenth century, and the idea of âhaving a good personalityâ was not widespread until the twentieth.â
But when they embraced the Culture of Personality, Americans started to focus on how others perceived them. They became captivated by people who were bold and entertaining. âThe social role demanded of all in the new Culture of Personality was that of a performer,â Susman famously wrote. âEvery American was to become a performing self.â
âOf course, the Extrovert Ideal is not a modern invention. Extroversion is in our DNAâliterally, according to some psychologists. The trait has been found to be less prevalent in Asia and Africa than in Europe and America, whose populations descend largely from the migrants of the world.â
đșThe myth of charismatic leadership
"If we assume that quiet and loud people have roughly the same number of good (and bad) ideas, then we should worry if the louder and more forceful people always carry the day. This would mean that an awful lot of bad ideas prevail while good ones get squashed. Yet studies in group dynamics suggest that this is exactly what happens. We perceive talkers as smarter than quiet typesâeven though grade-point averages and SAT and intelligence test scores reveal this perception to be inaccurate. â
âIn one experiment in which two strangers met over the phone, those who spoke more were considered more intelligent, better looking, and more likable. We also see talkers as leaders. The more a person talks, the more other group members direct their attention to him, which means that he becomes increasingly powerful as a meeting goes on. It also helps to speak fast; we rate quick talkers as more capable and appealing than slow talkers.â
Contrary to the Harvard Business School model of vocal leadership, the ranks of effective CEOs turn out to be filled with introverts, including Charles Schwab; Bill Gates; Brenda Barnes, CEO of Sara Lee; and James Copeland, former CEO of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
âGrant says it makes sense that introverts are uniquely good at leading initiative-takers. Because of their inclination to listen to others and lack of interest in dominating social situations, introverts are more likely to hear and implement suggestions. Having benefited from the talents of their followers, they are then likely to motivate them to be even more proactive. Extroverts, on the other hand, can be so intent on putting their own stamp on events that they risk losing othersâ good ideas along the way and allowing workers to lapse into passivityâ
đ§ When collaboration kills creativity
âOne of the most interesting findings, echoed by later studies, was that the more creative people tended to be socially poised introverts. They were interpersonally skilled but ânot of an especially sociable or participative temperament.â They described themselves as independent and individualistic. As teens, many had been shy and solitary.â
But thereâs a less obvious yet surprisingly powerful explanation for introvertsâ creative advantageâan explanation that everyone can learn from: introverts prefer to work independently, and solitude can be a catalyst to innovation. As the influential psychologist Hans Eysenck once observed, introversion âconcentrates the mind on the tasks in hand, and prevents the dissipation of energy on social and sexual matters unrelated to work.â In other words, if youâre in the backyard sitting under a tree while everyone else is clinking glasses on the patio, youâre more likely to have an apple fall on your head. (Newton was one of the worldâs great introverts. William Wordsworth described him as âA mind forever / Voyaging through strange seas of Thought alone.â)
While extroverts tend to attain leadership in public domains, introverts tend to attain leadership in theoretical and aesthetic fields. Outstanding introverted leaders, such as Charles Darwin, Marie Curie, Patrick White and Arthur Boyd, who have created either new fields of thought or rearranged existing knowledge, have spent long periods of their lives in solitude.
Hence leadership does not only apply in social situations, but also occurs in more solitary situations such as developing new techniques in the arts, creating new philosophies, writing profound books and making scientific breakthroughs.
Indeed, excessive stimulation seems to impede learning: a recent study found that people learn better after a quiet stroll through the woods than after a noisy walk down a city street.
âPsychologists usually offer three explanations for the failure of group brainstorming. The first is social loafing: in a group, some individuals tend to sit back and let others do the work. The second is production blocking: only one person can talk or produce an idea at once, while the other group members are forced to sit passively. And the third is evaluation apprehension, meaning the fear of looking stupid in front of oneâs peers.â
đ©ïžIs temperament destiny?
âNone of these studies is perfect, but the results have consistently suggested that introversion and extroversion, like other major personality traits such as agreeableness and conscientiousness, are about 40 to 50 percent heritable.â
Conversely, high-reactive children may be more likely to develop into artists and writers and scientists and thinkers because their aversion to novelty causes them to spend time inside the familiarâand intellectually fertileâenvironment of their own heads.
âLow-reactive, extroverted children, if raised by attentive families in safe environments, can grow up to be energetic achievers with big personalitiesâthe Richard Bransons and Oprahs of this world. But give those same children negligent caregivers or a bad neighborhood, say some psychologists, and they can turn into bullies, juvenile delinquents, or criminals.â
Lykken has controversially called psychopaths and heroes âtwigs on the same genetic branch.â
đBeyond temperament
âSchwartzâs research suggests something important: we can stretch our personalities, but only up to a point. Our inborn temperaments influence us, regardless of the lives we lead. A sizable part of who we are is ordained by our genes, by our brains, by our nervous systems. And yet the elasticity that Schwartz found in some of the high-reactive teens also suggests the converse: we have free will and can use it to shape our personalities.â
âEysenck believed that extroverts prefer more stimulation than introverts do, and that this explained many of their differences: introverts enjoy shutting the doors to their offices and plunging into their work, because for them this sort of quiet intellectual activity is optimally stimulating, while extroverts function best when engaged in higher wattage activities like organizing team-building workshops or chairing meetings.â
If youâre an introvert, find your flow by using your gifts. You have the power of persistence, the tenacity to solve complex problems, and the clear-sightedness to avoid pitfalls that trip others up. You enjoy relative freedom from the temptations of superficial prizes like money and status. Indeed, your biggest challenge may be to fully harness your strengths. You may be so busy trying to appear like a zestful, reward-sensitive extrovert that you undervalue your own talents, or feel underestimated by those around you. But when youâre focused on a project that you care about, you probably find that your energy is boundless.
đŁïžThe communication gap
Probably the most commonâand damagingâmisunderstanding about personality type is that introverts are antisocial and extroverts are prosocial. But as weâve seen, neither formulation is correct; introverts and extroverts are differently social. What psychologists call âthe need for intimacyâ is present in introverts and extroverts alike. In fact, people who value intimacy highly donât tend to be, as the noted psychologist David Buss puts it, âthe loud, outgoing, life-of-the-party extrovert.â They are more likely to be someone with a select group of close friends, who prefers âsincere and meaningful conversations over wild parties.â
Conversely, extroverts do not necessarily seek closeness from their socializing. âExtroverts seem to need people as a forum to fill needs for social impact, just as a general needs soldiers to fill his or her need to lead,â the psychologist William Graziano told me. âWhen extroverts show up at a party, everyone knows they are present.â